Our government leads us to believe that our vote matters, and that we should not take the responsibility lightly. A bit flawed, and needs some working to do. And the courts decided that was good enough to make him a non-Texan for electoral vote purposes.
Indeed, if we become obsessed with government by popular majority as the only consideration, should we not then abolish the Senate which represents States regardless of population. You see, through the past year or so, candidates went and rallied at these so called "battleground" states numerous times.
In 48 states the Electoral College is utilized in the same way Maine and Nebraska have a slight variation. Under this new system, when we vote for President we would actually be voting for President, not instructing 'electors' on how we want them to vote.
To be elected president, a candidate needs a majority of all the electoral votes in the country. If there are reasons to maintain State representation in the Senate and House as they exist today, then surely these same reasons apply to the choice of president.
Can this be a good thing. For as things stand now, no one region contains the absolute majority of electoral votes required to elect a president. In addition to protecting the presidency from impassioned but transitory third party movements, the practical effect of the Electoral College along with the single-member district system of representation in the Congress is to virtually force third party movements into one of the two major political parties.
There have been 7 such Electors in this century and as recently as when a Democrat Elector in the State of West Virginia cast his votes for Lloyd Bensen for president and Michael Dukakis for vice president instead of the other way around. We saw this happen on a smaller scale in the election.
As for the first issue, that the Electoral College over-represents rural populations, proponents respond that the United State Senate - with two seats per State regardless of its population - over-represents rural populations far more dramatically.
A direct popular election of the president would likely have the opposite effect. The fact is, they argue, that the original design of our federal system of government was thoroughly and wisely debated by the Founding Fathers.
Should we not correct the minor distortions in the House caused by districting and by guaranteeing each State at least one Representative by changing it to a system of proportional representation. History The founders who drew up the Constitution in were not willing to allow ordinary citizens to vote for their president directly.
As a group they are known as the electoral college. But since there have been no serious proposals to abolish the United States Senate on these grounds, why should such an argument be used to abolish the lesser case of the Electoral College.
The surviving candidates would thus be drawn to the regionalist or extremist views represented by these parties in hopes of winning the run-off election.
Opponents of the Electoral College system also point to the risk of so-called "faithless" Electors. Proposals for Revision of the Electoral College System. They feared people would simply back candidates they knew from their own state. Should the opinion of one person be able to overwrite the will of thousands or even millions of American voters.
Their reasoning is that in a formal federal structure, important political powers are reserved to the component States.
To abolish the Electoral College in favor of a nationwide popular election for president would strike at the very heart of the federal structure laid out in our Constitution and would lead to the nationalization of our central government - to the detriment of the States. Constitution to change the electoral college system.
The 17th Amendment made senators subject to direct election, and the 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote. Better not try to cram that whole saga in here right now. Jan 12, · As previously stated, the Electoral College is a winner take all system.
If a candidate wins the popular vote of a state by a just a single vote, he generally receives all the electoral votes of. The Electoral College (Why We Use It and Why It Matters) On Election Day, Americans should appreciate the great and long-lasting constitutional tradition bequeathed to them—including the quirky.
We should, however, recognize that even if the Electoral College is an anachronism that has long since ceased to perform as the framers expected, it fills other functions today.
Why its time to reform the Electoral College Even though the Electoral college worked in the past it isn’t working for the present. The Electoral College was created to help elect a president. How that works is the 50 states are assigned so many voting representatives depending on population in that state.
Opponents of the Electoral College are further concerned about its possible role in depressing voter turnout. Their argument is that, since each State is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the States to encourage voter participation.
The Electoral College was created, in part, to make the states feel important in a federalist government. If the amount of Electoral College votes a state receives was directly proportionate to its population, smaller rural states would be .Why the electoral college should be